Category: Let's talk
One day, while at my program during lunch, this dude asks me how I would like it if I had a wife that CONSTANTLY told me that she loves me, who'd wanna ALWAYS be "up my ass" EVERY SINGLE WHERE I'D GO, without giving me ONE MOMENT of ANY type of BREATHING SPACE, WHATSOEVER, who's CONSTANTLY RINGING my phone, ETC., ETC., because THAT'S HIS wife, and HE'S NOT LIKING it, ONE SOLID BIT. MY response to HIM was that SUCH would've been a PERFECT MATCH MADE in HEAVEN between me and her, so if HE no longer wanted her, I'd GLADLY take her, MYSELF. NEEDLESS to SAY that NOT ONLY was HE pissed off by what I said, OTHER dudes, along with SOME (however many that might've included, which isn't known), but NOT ALL, WOMEN were, as WELL, because I DARED to "BRAZENLY CONDONE (which was how THEY put it)" BEHAVIOR that GOES AGAINST the VERY GRAIN of "the NORM (THEIRS, naturally)." They demanded that I recant my response, and of COURSE, I BLATANTLY REFUSED, so to UNSUCCESSFULLY ATTEMPT to put ENOUGH PRESSURE on me, they reported me to the program supervisor, who ADAMANTLY ESTABLISHED that she CERTAINLY WASN'T getting in the middle of their "STUFF (which is how SHE put it)," so to show UTTER CONTEMPT for her WILLFUL NON-INVOLVEMENT, they've ALL decided to drop out of the program, ALTOGETHER. At ANOTHER time, LATER ON, ANOTHER fellow client remarked that he's "ROARIN' MAD" at me for causing his friends to leave, so I, along with a group of MY friends, told him that he should've MARCHED RIGHT ALONG WITH them, being THAT'S the case, and of COURSE, YOU guessed it, THAT pissed HIM off, too. MY ONLY QUESTION of this ENTIRE SCENARIO is: why is it that THESE CLOWNS, who knew me for YEARS, so APPARENTLY, they knew ENOUGH about how I'd respond to whatever they'd present me with, that's gonna INSTANTLY PRESENT ITSELF/THEMSELVES as the VERY ADVANTAGE at my VERY FINGERTIPS for me to take and "WEAPONIZE" against THEIR agenda, which I waste ABSOLUTELY NO TIME, WHATSOEVER, in doing so, put themselves in that position, anyway?
My main question is totally unrelated:
Why are your sentences so convoluted? Seriously. You have the vocabulary, but your structure is all over the place. You don't have to load up every sentence with adjectives.
To get sorta kinda back on topic, I think the people were idiots for apparently dropping out of a program over that, but otherwise I agree with them. Having a partner who pays attention is beautiful. Having a partner who won't give you a crying inch of your own space is intolerable.
It's ONLY INTOLERABLE if that's what you want, and you're DEPRIVED of it; if it's something that NEITHER of you want, at ANY time, EVER, and OTHERS are NON-TOLERANT of YOUR JOINT DECISION, because it violates THEIR code of what's ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR and what's NOT, THEY'LL just have to suck it up, get over it, and either accept it, ANYWAY, or simply go under, for all YOU should care, of course.
I should've kept this in my PREVIOUS post, but I was too sleepy at the time--to answer your UNRELATED QUESTION, Shepherdwolf, since CLARITY is ONE ESSENTIAL, out of however many OTHERS, sentence-structuring's simply on its own.
I think you deliberately cause trouble, and push what you believe on others. So why does this bother you? You got your desire, and ain't happy with it. Glad I ain't married to you. You'd annoy me, a whole lot.
Go back and get more attention. This is what you wish.
Blessings,
Sarah
you should be. because he would expect you to let him hump your let while you take a shit. enjoy lunch.
Actually humping while taking a shit would not be easy at all. And I don't understand the op's question.
I'm confused. Do you have to capitalize everything? god! I'm sorry, can't stand your typing.
And... I don't really understand the question?
Maybe I can help with this. He was asked a question about what he would do if he were married to a woman who was the proverbial clinging vine; someone who wouldn’t allow any kind of daylight between himself and her. He replied that he’d love it, and that anytime the other guy wanted to dump his wife, he’d have her in a flash so that he can be slowly suffocated to death, because apparently being smothered is some kind of weird sadomasochistic thing he’s evidently into. Other guy gets mad, other guy and friends demand that OP take back what he said, he refuses, they all try to get the program director involved enough to get the OP in trouble. She wants nothing to do with the whole situation, probably because she thinks she’s dealing with a bunch of stupid, co-dependent morons who have nothing better to do with their lives than to create drama and fight these petty, stupid little wars, so a lot of the other guy’s supporters take their marbles and go home, right? So, other guy gets even more upset because now all his stupid friends have left this program, whatever it is, and other guy has no one to play with anymore. OP and his friends piss other guy off even more by telling him that if he’s that upset, he can also take his marbles and go home and play with his stupid friends, doing all the stupid things this stupid flock of sheep all love to do. Did I get it right, basically?
Yep, pretty sure you did.
That's about the size of it. Now, considering Terence has apparently abandoned this topic anyway, maybe it can now fade back into the archives where it belongs. But give the guy some credit; this is one of the least preachy/strange topics he's done in recent memory.
But why did the other guy get angry? If two overbearing people are with each other, at least nobody else will be smothered by their relationship conduct. I agree with MGCB about the hostile reaction he received at the group. The person in charge took the right approach in not getting involved.
This kid is mentally ill. Why hasn't he been committed. Why is this even a thread. I thought community leaders had a job to clean shit up off the floor around here. Where is the topic management.
Chill, this is pretty much a free range site. Not a lot of stuff gets removed around here. And if it were to start, I think a lot of boards and board posts would disappear. Best way to make stuff disappear is to let it be buried under newer topics.
And a lot of board posters would disappear; we don't need people censoring every little thing just because it might be slightly offensive to someone. My belief is that if you don't wanna post on something and/or don't wanna read about a particular board topic, don't post and don't read.
Ah, johndy,thank you so much for explaining this for me.
Laughing.
just-chillin,
topic management is working just fine. I love reading something intertaining, and this one fits the bill nicely.
Marilyn...if you think that this idiot's posts are hard to listen to, imagine how difficult it is for
a sightling to have to read this drivel.
I've got him on ignore because reading his shite gives me a first class headache.
Just how painful on the eyes is it to read the original poster's ramblings?
Because he types in all caps.
Reyami... Terrance's typing is one huge run on sentence punctuated with words in all caps.
It's bad enough that his diction is so convoluted and full of made-up words - it doesn't help
that he throws in those all caps words at random.
I usually end up having to left click and highlight everything and slowly read that drivel line
by line. However, I've got better things to do with my time than read his shit, so I just save
myself a headache and general aggravation by keeping him and his sorry ass on ignore.
WELL, it's like THIS: EVEN IF you COMPLETELY "IGNORE" me, which ONLY THOSE of you that DON'T, STILL DON'T, new people ALWAYS join this site at WHATEVER POINT in time, and there's ALWAYS BOUND to be SOMEBODY, JUST LIKE YOURSELVES, that's "FISH-HOOKED" into these topics, and BASICLY, as long as NONE of us is violating any of the site's rules and regulations of CONDUCT, you're gonna ALWAYS get what you'll ALWAYS get from me, TOTALLY REGARDLESS of ANY NON-SITE-ADMIN. REPROCUSSIONS, laughingly mockable, as they've ALWAYS been, ALWAYS are, and will ALWAYS continue to be, so like what's already been said in THIS topic, ABSOLUTELY NOONE, but YOURSELF, FORCES you to READ, much less, PARTICIPATE, in ANY of it, but you STILL DO, and ENJOY COMPLAINING about it--if I hadn't ALREADY said that YOU just LOVE the "abuse," as you EAGERLY LOOK FORWARD to ENDLESSLY-MUCH MORE from me ENOUGH TIMES by NOW, saying it just ONE MORE TIME will CERTAINLY NOT be the LAST, because you'll STILL be back for THAT MUCH MORE, PLUS (LOL)!
Did he speak some wisdom?
(wow)!!!
Forereel, being ONE of the REGULAR RECIPPIENTS of my "BOARD-TOPIC ABUSE," is this, or is this not, the VERY FIRST, EVER, that I've expressed such, as YOU call, "WISDOM?"
I will agree with one point, there's not much administration on here, all bs. Community leaders, what are they leading exactly but banning people that shouldn't be banned and not banning those who should? Yeah, it is laughable. Then you see them posting in forum topics just adding to the mess. Of course they're also a product of the people they represent, so, take that for what you want. Then there are people who have no life and actually pay to have a blog on here. Folks, get a blogger account, or get a word press account, by a domain for $10 and save yourself the hive blind group think that ultimately pulls you into, and away from, reality. Sites like this and blind bargains do nothing but find more ways of charging blind people as superior alternatives to free ones which are much better. That said though, I occasionally have faith in my fellow blindie.
Regular abuse? If I agreed with you, about all your subjects, posted regularly that yes, yes women should, um, would I then be non abusive?
I never abuse you, I just find you vary entertaining.
Thanks.
Smile.
If you can explain what rules the original poster has violated, we'd be happy to look in to it. Until then, ...
There's not much administration on here because frankly the site is pretty wide open on what it does and doesn't allow. Break the rules, and you'll hear about it.
I haven't heard of anyone being unfairly banned in years though. And I'm at least something of a regular.
Forereel, GET "real (that WASN'T INTENDED as a bash)!" WHOEVER LIED to you, TELLING you that I said that you DID? All I asked, in DIRECT RESPONSE to YOUR post of: "Did he speak some wisdom?
(wow)!!!", was: "Forereel, being ONE of the REGULAR RECIPPIENTS of my "BOARD-TOPIC ABUSE," is this, or is this not, the VERY FIRST, EVER, that I've expressed such, as YOU call, "WISDOM?"", which MEANT that OBVIOUSLY, I wasn't the ABUSEE, but the ABUSER--MY APPOLOGY for the NON-CLARITY of THAT above, of course, and YES, as THIS, being the SIMILAR/EQUIVALENT-TYPE of the VERY FREE-FORUM OUTLET that a CERTAIN SOCIAL-NETWORK PHONE system is, as WELL, which I'm involved with, and HAVE been, for NINE YEARS, as of this upcoming MAY 2, IS OUR HOME for the VERY LIBERTY that's ALWAYS UPHELD, AGAIN, if you don't like the topic, the board, WHATEVER, but YET, you're FULLY PARTICIPATING in it, as though you ACTUALLY ASKED to have a GUN, pointed at your head, and it's FULLY LOADED, with the SAFETY off, and the VERY TRIGGER FINGER, about to do the INEVITABLE, how is it that ANY of us would've gotten it PARTIALLY-COMPLETELY WRONG to conclude that you're MANIACALLY FIXATED on the ENJOYMENT of YOUR OWN FOREVER NON-SOLVED COMPLAINTS, JUST BECAUSE?
BANG!
Bit full of yourself to think of yourself as the abuser here. At best, and even
this is stretching, you're a minor annoyance. At best you're entertainment. Like
watching videos of dumb people. Annoying, but entertaining. Comparing
yourself to having a gun pointed at your head is just overstating it. You're no
more a threat to any of us than a rock in our shoe.
And chillin', if this site is so awful, why are you here?
SilverLightning, can YOU ACTUALLY HIGHLIGHT ANY TOPIC that I created, where I "ran home, HYSTERICALLY BAWLIN' to MOMMY and DADDY to MAKE them BIG BOYS and GIRLS STOP PICKIN' on little-old ME for SAYIN' SUMP'M THEY DIDN'T LIKE?" MY calling myself "the ABUSER" CERTAINLY doesn't come from ANY SELF-OPINIONATION, WHATSOEVER, but ONLY as an OVERALL RESPONSE to how YOU, meaning (pardon the colloquialism) "YALL" have REACTIVELY responded to my DELIBERATE CONTROVERSIALLY-PROVOKATIVE DISCUSSIONS, as though I AM, when it's ONLY, like you said, NO MORE than just EQUAL ENTERTAINMENT between ALL of us that are involved, ESPECIALLY THOSE who LOVE to HATE it, as much as they HATE to LOVE it, which is EXACTLY WHY they ARE here, OTHERWISE, they WOULDN'T be, POINT-BLANK.
Ah, I did understand your response to my wisdom post.
But, if I answer your question honestly, well.
I took the ducking approach. Smile.
Disclaimer. Anything I may say, or might say, or maybe even don't say on these boards you create may or may not, depending on my mood of course, at the time of my writing, could or may be possibly the truth, or reflect my opinion, but this is subject to a bullshit meter, so you probably should apply one.
Laughing.
Except opinionation isn't a word. If you want to be full of yourself, at least use
real words.
NOW, who's REALLY full of themselves, as though YOU'RE the ALPH&OMEGA-AUTHORITY-DETERMINATION of WHAT WORDS are REAL, and WHAT WORDS AREN'T--YOU know EXACTLY what I meant, so let's DEFINITELY NOT, and SAY you NEVER COULD, EVEN on a WORSE day (LOL)!
You know what? I wish I had read this an hour or 4, ago. I can't sleep, and am now totally wide awake. If I'd read this around nine, I'd have gotten to sleep!
It's sure much less work, than counting sheep. And, I'm lazy. LOL
Blessings,
Sarah
Has anyone ever gotten to sleep by counting sheep? I used to try when I was
a kid, and it never did anything for me. Has it ever actually worked for
someone?
Here's a trick I did learn about Cody, and no, I've never been able to fall asleep counting sheep.
It's called the 4-7-8 rule.
Breathe in for four seconds, hold your breath for 7, then let it out for 8, then start again. Apparently CO2 buildup or something will cause you to fall asleep.
I've tried it, it kinda works, but my problem is I use one of those awful CPAP machines ... at least when the Better Half is home.
What's with all the random words being capitalized? Is that how you think you'd be saying this stuff out loud? Geez........
That's interesting, Leo, I'll have to try it.
And no, I've never tried counting sheep. I do much more arcane things to make my mind shut off. For instance, I will take two four-letter words, and try to change one into the other one letter at a time.
I'll give an example.
To change "port" into "deck:
port becomes pork
pork becomes pock
pock becomes dock
dock becomes deck
You might think that'd actually keep me up, but often I fall asleep halfway through a difficult one. The longer the word, the harder it gets.
I use one of those awful CPAP machines ... at least when the Better Half is home.
Whips off her own CPAP mask and high fives Leo
lols
Reciting 99 bottles of beer very slowly in my mind sometimes helps get me to sleep.
Yes Cody, counting sheep actually works for me sometimes. :)
WOW! It took THAT LONG for YOU FOLKS to re-group? You're CERTAINLY SLIPPIN' FAST (LOL)!
Why count them when you could just drink them?
I really, really hope you're talking about the beer, and not the sheep.
Laughing.
Um, how do you drink a sheep? I mean, you have to persuade the sheep to lie still while you're -- er -- never mind.
If you have to ask, you probably shouldn't try it.
Speaking of SHEEP, in the event that you thought that the day could NEVER come, as it's HUMANLY IMPOSSIBLE for such, see below.
Will your computer delete your thoughts?
April 27, 2017
Will your computer delete your thoughts?
A man demonstrates how he uses a keyboard without typing by wearing a skull-cap with sensors, at a conference on brain technology in... © Nir Elias / Reuters May 06, 2015 03:47pm EDT
“Thou canst not touch the freedom of my mind,” wrote the playwright John Milton in 1634. But, nearly 400 years later, technological advances in machines that can read our thoughts mean the privacy of our brain is under threat. Will your computer delete your thoughts without your knowledge or permission? Experts warn the public about the possibility of this happening sooner than we think.
The Independent reports that two biomedical ethicists are calling for the creation of new human rights laws to ensure people are protected, including “the right to cognitive liberty” and “the right to mental integrity”. Pretty alarming news considering that the legal system is still trying to figure out how to protect something as basic as religious freedom. Science is expanding at a speed that surpasses understanding and scientists have already developed devices capable of telling whether people are politically right-wing or left-wing. In one experiment, researchers were able to read people’s minds to tell with 70 per cent accuracy whether they planned to add or subtract two numbers.
Facebook also recently revealed it had been secretly working on technology to read people’s minds so they could type by just thinking. And medical researchers have managed to connect part of a paralyzed man’s brain to a computer to allow him to stimulate muscles in his arm so he could move it and feed himself.
The ethicists, writing in a paper in the journal Life Sciences, Society and Policy, stressed the “unprecedented opportunities” that would result from the “ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuro-applications” that would make neurotechnology “intricately embedded in our everyday life”.
However, such devices are open to abuse on a frightening degree, as the academics made clear. They warned that “malicious brain-hacking” and “hazardous uses of medical neurotechnology” could require a redefinition of the idea of mental integrity.
“We suggest that in response to emerging neurotechnology possibilities, the right to mental integrity should not exclusively guarantee protection from mental illness or traumatic injury but also from unauthorized intrusions into a person’s mental wellbeing performed through the use of neurotechnology, especially if such intrusions result in physical or mental harm to the neurotechnology user,” the ethicists wrote.
“The right to mental privacy is a neuro-specific privacy right which protects private or sensitive information in a person’s mind from unauthorized collection, storage, use, or even deletion in digital form or otherwise.”
And they warned that the techniques were so sophisticated that people’s minds might be being read or interfered with without their knowledge.
“Illicit intrusions into a person’s mental privacy may not necessarily involve coercion, as they could be performed under the threshold of a persons’ conscious experience,” they wrote in the paper.
“The same goes for actions involving harm to a person’s mental life or unauthorized modifications of a person’s psychological continuity, which are also facilitated by the ability of emerging neurotechnologies to intervene into a person’s neural processing in absence of the person’s awareness.”
They proposed four new human rights laws: the right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity and the right to psychological continuity.
Professor Roberto Andorno, an academic at Zurich University’s law school and a co-author of the paper, put out a serious warning:
“We need to be prepared to deal with the impact these technologies will have on our personal freedom.”
The Independent copy / TRUNEWS summary.
Please contact TRUNEWS with any news tips related to this story. Email: Info@trunews.com
DOWNLOAD THE TRUNEWS MOBILE APP on Apple and Google Play!
id880594743 mt=8Get it on Google Play
How THIS correlates with the "SHEEP" discussion is that TOTALLY REGARDLESS of OUR THINKING that we're "OUR OWN," we're NOT, but we DO own the POWER of DECISION as to WHO we follow, which ULTIMATELY DETERMINES if we're either CAPTIVES BY, or CONQUERORS OVER, the VERY AGENDA, as described in the above-posted article.
Guess you all should be careful about your sheep thoughts.
Laughing.
Wait wait wait. I get it.
If you carry the 1, what Terrance is saying is that we're all just androids dreaming of electric sheep.
Think about it, people.
Balderdash!
OP is a view count whore = FACT!
The REAL fact is that there are THOSE of YOU that are, UNLIKE SHEEP, though, but like FLIES, INSTEAD, drawn to an awaiting "ZAPPER" by some sort of LIGHT, or whatever, and the INSTANT that you make CONTACT, you're IMMEDIATELY "ZAPPED," NOT that you're KILLED, in the sense of that you'll GO AWAY, but that your OWN agenda, if you HAVE any, is MERCILESSLY SABOTAGED, whenever you're finding yourselves posting to any of my topics, NO THANKS to ME, in case you're thinking that I'm SUPPOSEDLY being "FULL of MYSELF AGAIN," due to the fact that ALL EVIDENCE speaks for ITSELF, which CERTAINLY doesn't include ANY FURTHER INVOLVEMENT from ME, than just MERELY setting the trap, and going about my TOTALLY-UNRELATED business, with periodical check-ins for any results, but what COMPLETELY DISQUALIFIES me as "WHORISH" is that I'M not the one that looks for YOU. Whether you POST or you DON'T, NOT ONLY does it not MATTER to me, but that what FURTHER disqualifies MY behavior as "WHORISH" is that it's ALWAYS THOSE of YOU that are the VERY SAME "FLIES" from PREVIOUS topics of mine, NEVER SAYING that NO NEW "FLIES" are ever trapped, due to the OTHER fact that there are those viewers that DON'T post, THEMSELVES, that are SELF-DRIVEN, ONLY, to post, and that NONE of my topics are OBLIGATED, WHATSOEVER, to stay ONLY on ANY ONE SUBJECT or ANOTHER, because if THAT was the case that any ARE/WERE, what could've/would've prevented me from "ZAPPING" any of YOU with the "IGNORE" button?
So Gregg, I suppose you've found the answer to the question. Do Androids
Dream of Electric Sheep? The anser is yes.
I bet you could drink a sheep though, or at least I bet the makers of the
nutro-bullet or some other high end juicers would claim that you can. It
probably cures cancer. Everything seems to cure cancer to those people. You
want to laugh while simultaneously facepalming until you have a handprint on
your face, look up some of David avacado wolf's speeches. Yeah, that's his real
name.
What if you were to find out that it's REALLY an ALIAS?
why don't you just assault the woman in the OP so you finally get locked up
nobody wants to read your shitty posts anymore
actually I take that back no person, man or woman, deserves to deal with
mygodchosenbride&i4lifefinally
Lol! you go girl!
Just had a tasty burger.
A Big Kahuna burger?
Dude, you are what we call paranoid. Ya need major help.
You are annoying us, and think it's funny. The problem is, nobody listens anymore, because, you sound like you are paranoid.
That's why I take my pills, so I do not obsess, or get scared of my shadow, so-to-speak. If I didn't, I'd be afraid of everything, and I don't want to live like that.
Blessings,
Sarah